Suggesty

Extension that summarizes Google search results.

Suggesty Overview

What is Suggesty?

Suggesty is a Chrome Web Store Extension that uses GPT-3 artificial intelligence technology to provide users with human-like answers to their Google searches. The extension eliminates the need to scroll through all results pages by providing users with the answers they need straight away. It works by sending the anonymized Google search request to GPT-3 and displaying the answers on the Google page. This tool can be used for grammar correction, translation, creating recipes, and making any other request such as movie recommendations, step-by-step guides, and more. Suggesty is a safe and secure extension that follows recommended practices for Chrome extensions and does not collect or use any user data. It has been positively reviewed by users who appreciate its ease of use and ability to summarize information quickly. Help other people by letting them know if this AI was useful. Add your own prompts and outputs to help others understand how to use this AI.

Screenshot gallery

Pros & Cons

Pros

Eliminates scrolling through results
Direct human-like answers
Anonymized Google search requests
Grammar correction feature
Translation feature
Recipe creation
Movie recommendation feature
Guidance feature
Secure Chrome extension
Doesn't collect user-data
High user appreciation
Quick summary capability
In-app purchase option
Compact size (12.36KiB)
Multi-purpose tool

Cons

Only for Chrome Browser
Requires internet connection
Limited to Google searches
Lacks advanced customization
Depends on GPT-3 accuracy
Potential translation limitations
In-app purchases
May not handle complex queries
No data export options
Can't work with images

A Professional Framework to Evaluate Suggesty

When considering Suggesty for integration into your organizational workflow, we recommend deploying a structured score card across three critical operational pillars: Security & Compliance, Integration Friction, and long-term Price Scalability. Rather than looking only at basic feature lists, modern procurement teams must assess how a software platform behaves under high load and how well it fits into the team's data security guidelines.

1. Security and Database Compliance

Depending on your operating region and field, ensure that Suggesty supports standard security layers such as SOC 2 Type II certifications, GDPR compliance, or HIPAA-compliant database encryption. If the tool connects directly to client database tables or handles user passwords, verify that they implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), single sign-on (SSO) integrations, and end-to-end data encryption in transit and at rest.

2. API Coverage and Custom Integrations

Siloed data is the primary cause of operational friction. Evaluate if Suggesty has native connectors for your current project trackers, messaging hubs, and customer communication channels. For custom developer requirements, check if they provide a fully documented REST API with reasonable rate limits, comprehensive Webhooks support, and robust SDK packages in your language. A flexible API layer saves hundreds of hours of manual copy-paste overhead.

3. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

SaaS pricing packages are often deceptively simple. When reviewing Suggesty's billing structure, map out your team's projected expansion over the next 12 to 24 months. Determine how costs scale as your customer database increases or as you add team members. Factor in setup costs, mandatory support plan upgrades, API access fees, and storage overage rates to understand the true cost before committing to a contract.

By combining verified user reviews from our directory with internal workflow pilot tests, your procurement team can make an informed decision that drives productivity without creating capital waste.

Features of Suggesty

Google Search
Automatic Summarization
Search Engine
Web Extension
Time Saving
Internet Search

SaaS1to10 verified reviews for Suggesty

Overall rating

5.0

Based on 16 reviews

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

easy to pick up and you get a few free file imports. it gives you results pretty fast, unfortunately i can't find a way to get back to these, they're locked behind the paid service.

Ron Jayson

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

I'm still testing the tool yet it looks very promising. I tested it with a 5.5k words Academic text that I had previously red. I tested the Key points feature, it does work!

Ivana González

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

after playing around with it for a bit, i am now aware of how much i need this. i can already feel the hours of sleep coming back to me <3

Bru no no no

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

It created animals with more than 4 legs and multiple animals when I asked for one. Sometimes you have to run it a few times with the same prompt to get something usable, but even then it probably won't be what you are thinking in your head. That being said, I think it is a good start, and for kids that just want to color something for free, it's cool to play with. It is definitely not the same quality as even the lower-end HuggingFace Stable Diffusion projects.

B C

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

It didn’t help me at all and didn’t provide any accurate information; it’s still incomplete.

hana

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

This is a powerful and helpful real-life app.

Sue

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

An amazing app, I love the share feature and the comment section summaries

Silvia Cho

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

I tried NovelGPT a template in @Agentgpt and it did an excellent job writing the first two episodes of my novel complete with character descriptions, setting,plot points and well I think you get the point. Great tool can't wait to see it out of beta.

Kelli Crose

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Loved the search engine ideas.

Amr عمرو Amin امين

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

I've tried to find the exact articles via WoS, Google, or Scopus. Despite using a very advised and complicated search query, it was just a waste of time. Perplexity didn't help either. The Jenni AI, which may add useful links when generating text, finds nothing but trash. SciScape gave exactly what I needed from the first query! A couple of fresh relative articles with very exact topics!

Elijah

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

It seems to be working fine right now. Maybe try again and double check if you’re using the book’s original or most recognized title. That might make a difference.

Alexandru Bostina

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

It's sad to see people want to try your tool out but you have no free sample for them. This may be the best tool out there, but, as mentioned, going through with the AI for minutes to explain what you want, then being prompted to pay, without even knowing if it CAN create something, is discouraging. I hope we can get a free sample or preview at one point, im interested in this one.

Ron Jayson

5.02 weeks ago