“Review”
I tried NovelGPT a template in @Agentgpt and it did an excellent job writing the first two episodes of my novel complete with character descriptions, setting,plot points and well I think you get the point. Great tool can't wait to see it out of beta.
Kelli Crose
“Review”
As the service was in beta-testing stage, I created there a dozen of AI-generated courses for free. I wanted to use them. Those courses remained in my account as they started subscription tiers. But recently I have found out that they were deleted. The support didn't answer to my e-mail at all.
Oldfag TV
“Review”
The best among similar tools. Don't forget to add all your newsletters to get rid of them.
Valeriy Klyukin
“Review”
It's perfect work
Ярослав Богданов
“Review”
Im a doctor and I think that it is very correct and useful
Black Rose
“Review”
I have been using this application for some time now, and it pleasantly surprises me. At first, this tool seemed to be just something like a smart document search, but I was wrong. It is able to generate brief contents of books and documents. With it, I will be able to create my own knowledge base in various areas, which will be built only on the data I uploaded, which I am sure of. Overall, the app is great, and I can safely recommend it. How do I personally use this product: For example, to summarize medical research and books. I intend to use it for academic research to save time searching for answers to specific questions and searching for links (documents, pages, comments), and I have to say that I am impressed. I upload not only PDF documents, but also transcribe videos of specialists in the right subject and upload them together to the service. Thus, I make my personal library, knowledge base and the quality of knowledge deeper. More recently, I came up with the idea to use the knowledge of some specialists who run their social networks and tell me the information I am interested in on their pages, because I can also collect their posts on social networks. networks in one document and upload to the service. What I liked especially: 1. Simple and user-friendly interface. Everything is in its place and nothing superfluous. 2. The algorithm does not come up with answers, but proceeds from the data in the document, allowing you to ask contextual questions and receive point-to-point answers in real time. Very often, language models sin against this. 3. Unlimited questions in the "chat" You can ask as many questions as you want in real time without using any credits. 4. Unlimited daily download. 5. I can upload documents in any language and get answers in my own. I can make full use of knowledge from all over the world, not just in my language. 6. The file viewer and links work well. Just click on the link and you will open the document in exactly the right place! 7. Chat with documents is quite accurate and fast. 8. The idea of labels is quite convenient and it is possible to add multiple labels to a file. 9. After downloading the document, it will warn you which pages were not recognized or have little content. 10. Understands the context of the correspondence, and does not answer the last question. 11. Responsive support. 12. API Access 13. OCR. 14. Automation of the workflow. 15. The ability to use your OpenAI API key 16. There is a promising roadmap. Separately, I would like to tell you about the workflow automation function, with the help of, when working with a group of documents, which can be processed separately only the necessary sections of documents. This makes it possible to access several documents at once. This is a super opportunity to gain deeper knowledge from documents uploaded to the service. It should be noted that in the end, a lot depends on how correctly you ask the question. This is both a plus and a minus. An experienced user will always be able to bring the algorithm to the conclusions of interest. For novice researchers, it will be a little more difficult to set the right direction to find the right information. My dreams: 1. Although I have no problems with the document loading time, it would be cool to speed up the document processing time. 2. I would like more free language models. At the moment, the service uses OpenAL GPT 3.5 Turbo and Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku. In principle, this is enough, but it would be good if more advanced language models were included, which will allow you to study your documents even more deeply. 3. I would like to be able to add ready-made template queries to documents. 4. I would like to be able to mark the best answers, which I can quickly refer to later. 5. I would like to be able to create folders in the Documents and Options section cataloging my knowledge. 6. I would like to be able to change the title of the document. 7. I would like to have an internal search system for documents or labels, which will become very numerous over time. 8. It would be very useful to be able to add people to work together with configured access rights. 9. The opportunity to create your own knowledge base and post it on your website via html code would be very useful. 10. I would like to be able to highlight the desired fragment or keywords in the document when you click on the link in the response to the document request. What I wanted to draw attention to: It seemed to me that OCR does not work quite correctly, after downloading the document, it writes "you have not enough credits to use OCR", although there are credits. Maybe I was doing something wrong. I'll figure it out. In general, I would like to rate the usage experience at 5 stars. I recommend everyone to try it!
Stanislav M
“Review”
I would highly recommend for researches and students. useful to manage your articles and use AI to get the key points.
Hamed Mousavi
“Review”
Really like how it finds connection in the content that I save. I don't think any other tool can do that.
amix ffx
“Review”
Suppppeeeeerrr! Wowwww! @Mindsmith is absolutely fantastic! It is incredibly useful, easy to use, and very professional.
Claudia Scilletta
“Review”
It's sad to see people want to try your tool out but you have no free sample for them. This may be the best tool out there, but, as mentioned, going through with the AI for minutes to explain what you want, then being prompted to pay, without even knowing if it CAN create something, is discouraging. I hope we can get a free sample or preview at one point, im interested in this one.
Ron Jayson
“Review”
An amazing app, I love the share feature and the comment section summaries
Silvia Cho
“Review”
After my first use, I think it's surprisingly good. The only drawback so far is the PDF export option for the report which is formatless.
Alejandro Correa
“Review”
O GPT faz uma análise melhor e mais personalizada.
Vinicius Vilela
“Review”
I tried using it but the website has too many bugs.
João Neiva
“Review”
The website is pretty good but there are only a limited number of responses
Probal Roy
“Review”
Great! I think @AI Lawyer is the best service I've ever seen. Perfect use. Prompting helps in the work
Yuri Gerasimov
“Review”
Tried it several times and it really did make entries for me. Not quite fast, as i use Claude in browser. But when i use all of my Claude tokens i use it.
Vansh Thakur
“Review”
@Fabric is kind of like a combo of bookmarking/webclipper/summarizer/knowledgebase. Basically you can add information and it will auto organize it as well as let you chat with this information and search through it. It is not a “search engine tool” I wouldn’t say. Maybe you will be able to create a knowledge, base and information repository of everything relevant to you and be able to search through that information… But that is still different than a “search engine, tool” in my opinion. So far I think they are shooting for individuals and not enterprise users. Which is great because I have been wanting to find a product that will allow me to add information from PDFs, websites and videos and then be able to search/query/chat with that. But so many of the companies I have found that offer anything close to along these lines are developing knowledge bases with only company customers in mind. I get that that is where the money is, but @Fabric appears to be for actual people to use. The product is definitely underdevelopment, and I have the TestFlight of their iOS app. I wouldn’t say the app is perfect yet or anything, but they are actively developing it, and some of their ideas are changing and evolving not just minor changes to their user interface. I am using @Fabric and Mem at the same time and I will be interested to see which turns put to be more for me. Definitely check it out if you have not already done so they have the opportunity to make an extremely useful tool and kind of even changing the way individuals think about storing/accessing information important to them.
Extra Google Account