“Review”
Looks great, helps my family a lot!
mikew12044@lofiey.com
Practice realistic AI-driven FAANG coding interviews.
Intervu.dev is an AI-enriched coding interview preparation platform specifically designed to simulate FAANG-style technical interviews. Unlike other platforms, it evaluates not only the correctness of the problem solution but also focuses on the user's ability to articulate their thought process, decision trade-offs, and code quality. The unique feature of this AI-based tool is that it introduces live coding under real-time constraints, thereby testing one's ability to think, communicate, and code in pressurised scenarios. These AI-driven mock coding interview sessions include probing questions and immediate follow-ups that tend to reflect the same level of rigour as real interviews. The interview stages follow a structure akin to real technical interviews, including, clarifying the problem statement, designing the solution, coding, testing, and receiving feedback with a focus on interview signals such as clarity, trade-offs, and execution. Notably, the platform provides multi-language support to accommodate users fluent in various programming languages including, but not limited to, Python, JavaScript, Java, and C++. In essence, intervu.dev provides an interactive, realistic environment where users can refine their problem-solving and communication skills to ace job interviews in top tech companies. Help other people by letting them know if this AI was useful. Add your own prompts and outputs to help others understand how to use this AI.

When considering intervu.dev for integration into your organizational workflow, we recommend deploying a structured score card across three critical operational pillars: Security & Compliance, Integration Friction, and long-term Price Scalability. Rather than looking only at basic feature lists, modern procurement teams must assess how a software platform behaves under high load and how well it fits into the team's data security guidelines.
Depending on your operating region and field, ensure that intervu.dev supports standard security layers such as SOC 2 Type II certifications, GDPR compliance, or HIPAA-compliant database encryption. If the tool connects directly to client database tables or handles user passwords, verify that they implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), single sign-on (SSO) integrations, and end-to-end data encryption in transit and at rest.
Siloed data is the primary cause of operational friction. Evaluate if intervu.dev has native connectors for your current project trackers, messaging hubs, and customer communication channels. For custom developer requirements, check if they provide a fully documented REST API with reasonable rate limits, comprehensive Webhooks support, and robust SDK packages in your language. A flexible API layer saves hundreds of hours of manual copy-paste overhead.
SaaS pricing packages are often deceptively simple. When reviewing intervu.dev's billing structure, map out your team's projected expansion over the next 12 to 24 months. Determine how costs scale as your customer database increases or as you add team members. Factor in setup costs, mandatory support plan upgrades, API access fees, and storage overage rates to understand the true cost before committing to a contract.
By combining verified user reviews from our directory with internal workflow pilot tests, your procurement team can make an informed decision that drives productivity without creating capital waste.
Overall rating
Based on 14 reviews
Looks great, helps my family a lot!
mikew12044@lofiey.com
Great product to offload the data analytics workflow.
Pedro A Porras Luraschi
Reducing manual efforts in first-pass during code-review process helps speed up the "final check" before merging PRs
Sahil Mohan Bansal
Very interesting
Béatrice Duval
I got some top quality results after learning how to prompt songs 🤩
Claes Lanng
I have been using @Saufter, and I'm blown away. It has created a marketing newsletters for all of my sales leads, and is giving me data on which leads are interacting with the newsletters, it has created a new 'recently active' segment. I just got the fully drafted campaign in my inbox last week. Very cool!
Ryan Mason
Really like how it finds connection in the content that I save. I don't think any other tool can do that.
amix ffx
This tool i found is super cool, I created 5 books from this tool to sell them online, which gives me great profit. I am creating more valuable books to spread knowledge, and earn some bucks as well 🤑.
Bilal Ashraf
State of the Art
Dmitry G.
Went from a C to an A in Cognitive Psychology using @Thea!!
Sarah White
B12 exceeded my expectations especially after I tried a few similar tools. Signing up took under a minute and because I offer a very specific set of services as a consultant, I didn't expect the AI to be able to capture my work, but it did a great job with creating content for me. I only had to make a few edits, add my bio, and was able to publish that same day. Now I get lots of compliments on my site and I've even tried their other tools like email marketing, which is great because the emails match my site's appearance. Overall I would recommend B12 as an effective, affordable, and easy to use website solution.
Katie G
@Mocko.ai not good for TEF preparation. ⚠️ Broken AI Service & No Customer Support [Update: I successfully got all my money back via bank dispute.] I spent $202.72 on @Mocko.ai(purchased in Dec, 2025) for TEF preparation, and it is a total failure. The AI is broken — it marks correct answers as "Wrong" even when they match the audio perfectly. The product does not do what it promises. My Evidence (Screenshots: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GgneM32b3BEMZd7P82tjxnYgDwV37N2_?usp=sharing): 1. 100% Error Rate: I did 5 random tests. Each time, I answered only the first listening question, recorded the audio, took a screenshot then went to result. Every single time, the AI marked my correct answer as "Wrong." 2. Unable to review any listening question in mock exam: The review page crashed with a coding error: "Something went wrong while showing your report. examContext.Provider is missing!" 3. No Correct Answers Provided: In the listening mock exam, the system flags your answers as "Wrong" but doesn't tell you the correct answers. 4. Inaccurate Grading: I recorded a full listening test in mock exam and converted the audio to text. The AI claimed I got 29 wrong (especially a weird pattern from Q3 to Q14). I compared these with ChatGPT and Gemini, and both confirmed that my answers should be 29 correct and 11 wrong.
Hongyu Shen
@CodePup AI is incredible — it makes generating professional websites effortless with zero coding required.
suryansh singh
Too expensive, went for Stealth Interview AI instead
Manish
Starting Price
Free plan available
Free tier available with optional paid upgrades.