AuditAEv2.0

Track brand citations across every AI engine.

Free

AuditAEv2.0 Overview

What is AuditAEv2.0?

AuditAE is an AI visibility tool specializing in tracking brand mentions across various AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. The primary focus of this tool is to monitor, audit, and reveal prompts where a brand is mentioned. It does this by running user-specific prompts against the mentioned AI engines and uncovering each instance where the brand is cited. In an event where a competitor's URL is mentioned instead of the brand, AuditAE provides strategies to close this gap. It further delves into tracking the specific domains each engine cites, sentiment analysis of every mention, and the performance gap between the audited brand and those gaining more visibility. This tool can be utilized without a subscription, allowing users to track their brands without the need for account creation or email registration. AuditAE is equipped to return the same six fields for each prompt per engine cell. These dimensions include brand mentions anywhere in the answer body, citation sources, competitor brands that are surfaced for the same prompt, positioning of the brand mention in the response, sentiment of the mention, and trends against the last audit performed. Thus, it enables businesses to understand how their brand is perceived and mentioned by different AI platforms, providing valuable insights for competitive positioning in the market. Free AI audit, no signup — drop in a brand + a prompt and get a live cross-engine result in ~30s (mentioned vs. URL-cited, competitors who got cited instead, the source list), with a shareable report. Email is optional, not a gate. Four engines, one comparable view — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews on the same prompt set, with share-of-voice vs. competitors and a "most-cited sources" content-gap roadmap. AEBOT — an in-product AI analyst (78 tools) — chat that actually does the work: runs audits, queries your GA4 + Search Console, keyword research & rank tracking, technical/Core Web Vitals audits, and writes monthly reports. Now with specialist sub-agents (backlink + reputation) and persistent per-org memory. WordPress plugin — tracks ~30 AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended…), turns bot 404s into one-click 301s, serves llms.txt, emits linked JSON-LD schema, and pushes fixes back to Yoast/Rank Math. Keyword + AI-Overview rank tracking — including a one-time 12-month historical backfill so trend charts aren't empty on day one, plus search-volume trends. Backlink authority snapshots, CMS/tech detection, open-web brand mentions, and a Local SEO / NAP audit. MCP server — @auditae/mcp npx bridge to run AuditAE from Claude Code or any MCP client. Recent UX upgrades — redesigned AI-search playbook page, a live loading experience on the free audit (progress + per-engine status), and a full-screen chat assistant. Pricing — $0.05 per (prompt × engine) check, $5 free on signup, no seats, no per-domain fees. Help other people by letting them know if this AI was useful. Add your own prompts and outputs to help others understand how to use this AI.

Screenshot gallery

Pros & Cons

Pros

Live cross-engine audits
Analyzes brand sentiment
Insights for strategy optimization
Flexible pay-as-you-go model
No subscription required
Prompts user specific analyses
Closes competitors URL gaps
Analyses domain citing
Offers cross platform analysis
Provides domain-wise citing insights
Analyzes sentiment of mentions
Handles share-of-voice gap
Provides competitor performance analysis
No account creation needed
Returns six distinct data points
Tracks citation sources
Offers trend analysis since last audit
Provides competitor brand visibility
Assesses brand mention positioning
AuditAE is Subscription-free
Flexible pricing model
Analyze brand position trends
Optimal for search engine strategies
Enables efficient brand positioning
Requires no email registration
Analyzes each prompt instance
Assists in reducing share-of-voice gap
Provides cross-engine studies
Efficient for vertical benchmarks
No card required for operation
Conducts real prompt analyses
Offers strategic measures to close gaps
Discrete and detailed analytics
Provides public share link option
Offers free product audit
Offers multiple choice server options
Effective brand and domain audit
Provides share-of-voice panel
Offers PDF exportable results
Analyze real-time trends
Captures brand mention positioning
Insights on competitor brands
Free audits available
No signups for usage
Record brand visibility
In-depth brand awareness data
Multiple engine compatibility
Supplies prompt-level trends

Cons

No free tier
No subscription model
No account creation
Limited to six data fields
Requires user prompts
No integrated feedback system
No application interface
No trend beyond last audit
Doesn't include backlink analysis

A Professional Framework to Evaluate AuditAEv2.0

When considering AuditAEv2.0 for integration into your organizational workflow, we recommend deploying a structured score card across three critical operational pillars: Security & Compliance, Integration Friction, and long-term Price Scalability. Rather than looking only at basic feature lists, modern procurement teams must assess how a software platform behaves under high load and how well it fits into the team's data security guidelines.

1. Security and Database Compliance

Depending on your operating region and field, ensure that AuditAEv2.0 supports standard security layers such as SOC 2 Type II certifications, GDPR compliance, or HIPAA-compliant database encryption. If the tool connects directly to client database tables or handles user passwords, verify that they implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), single sign-on (SSO) integrations, and end-to-end data encryption in transit and at rest.

2. API Coverage and Custom Integrations

Siloed data is the primary cause of operational friction. Evaluate if AuditAEv2.0 has native connectors for your current project trackers, messaging hubs, and customer communication channels. For custom developer requirements, check if they provide a fully documented REST API with reasonable rate limits, comprehensive Webhooks support, and robust SDK packages in your language. A flexible API layer saves hundreds of hours of manual copy-paste overhead.

3. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

SaaS pricing packages are often deceptively simple. When reviewing AuditAEv2.0's billing structure, map out your team's projected expansion over the next 12 to 24 months. Determine how costs scale as your customer database increases or as you add team members. Factor in setup costs, mandatory support plan upgrades, API access fees, and storage overage rates to understand the true cost before committing to a contract.

By combining verified user reviews from our directory with internal workflow pilot tests, your procurement team can make an informed decision that drives productivity without creating capital waste.

Features of AuditAEv2.0

API
Brand Citations
Brand Monitoring
Brand Tracking
Brand Citation Tracking
Brand Visibility
Free + From $5

SaaS1to10 verified reviews for AuditAEv2.0

Overall rating

5.0

Based on 19 reviews

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

i love it i use it to teach me Italian and ukranian and programing ! and it awesome , because it allows you in the free version send many prints of your screen , not having to explain all the errors by typing diferent from gpt that you can only send 3 photos in the free version. i also use @Grok to study i frist make the exercise in my book then i take a photo of my exercise then i ask it to see if there is any mistake and dissipate my terryble handwriting it understands

fernand Lopes

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Its a promising project and works well so far. Wishing them all the best and godspeed.

Dipak Rautela

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Never thought I needed this but it’s really good

Paul

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

I have been using this application for some time now, and it pleasantly surprises me. At first, this tool seemed to be just something like a smart document search, but I was wrong. It is able to generate brief contents of books and documents. With it, I will be able to create my own knowledge base in various areas, which will be built only on the data I uploaded, which I am sure of. Overall, the app is great, and I can safely recommend it. How do I personally use this product: For example, to summarize medical research and books. I intend to use it for academic research to save time searching for answers to specific questions and searching for links (documents, pages, comments), and I have to say that I am impressed. I upload not only PDF documents, but also transcribe videos of specialists in the right subject and upload them together to the service. Thus, I make my personal library, knowledge base and the quality of knowledge deeper. More recently, I came up with the idea to use the knowledge of some specialists who run their social networks and tell me the information I am interested in on their pages, because I can also collect their posts on social networks. networks in one document and upload to the service. What I liked especially: 1. Simple and user-friendly interface. Everything is in its place and nothing superfluous. 2. The algorithm does not come up with answers, but proceeds from the data in the document, allowing you to ask contextual questions and receive point-to-point answers in real time. Very often, language models sin against this. 3. Unlimited questions in the "chat" You can ask as many questions as you want in real time without using any credits. 4. Unlimited daily download. 5. I can upload documents in any language and get answers in my own. I can make full use of knowledge from all over the world, not just in my language. 6. The file viewer and links work well. Just click on the link and you will open the document in exactly the right place! 7. Chat with documents is quite accurate and fast. 8. The idea of labels is quite convenient and it is possible to add multiple labels to a file. 9. After downloading the document, it will warn you which pages were not recognized or have little content. 10. Understands the context of the correspondence, and does not answer the last question. 11. Responsive support. 12. API Access 13. OCR. 14. Automation of the workflow. 15. The ability to use your OpenAI API key 16. There is a promising roadmap. Separately, I would like to tell you about the workflow automation function, with the help of, when working with a group of documents, which can be processed separately only the necessary sections of documents. This makes it possible to access several documents at once. This is a super opportunity to gain deeper knowledge from documents uploaded to the service. It should be noted that in the end, a lot depends on how correctly you ask the question. This is both a plus and a minus. An experienced user will always be able to bring the algorithm to the conclusions of interest. For novice researchers, it will be a little more difficult to set the right direction to find the right information. My dreams: 1. Although I have no problems with the document loading time, it would be cool to speed up the document processing time. 2. I would like more free language models. At the moment, the service uses OpenAL GPT 3.5 Turbo and Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku. In principle, this is enough, but it would be good if more advanced language models were included, which will allow you to study your documents even more deeply. 3. I would like to be able to add ready-made template queries to documents. 4. I would like to be able to mark the best answers, which I can quickly refer to later. 5. I would like to be able to create folders in the Documents and Options section cataloging my knowledge. 6. I would like to be able to change the title of the document. 7. I would like to have an internal search system for documents or labels, which will become very numerous over time. 8. It would be very useful to be able to add people to work together with configured access rights. 9. The opportunity to create your own knowledge base and post it on your website via html code would be very useful. 10. I would like to be able to highlight the desired fragment or keywords in the document when you click on the link in the response to the document request. What I wanted to draw attention to: It seemed to me that OCR does not work quite correctly, after downloading the document, it writes "you have not enough credits to use OCR", although there are credits. Maybe I was doing something wrong. I'll figure it out. In general, I would like to rate the usage experience at 5 stars. I recommend everyone to try it!

Stanislav M

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Just implemented your instruction out how to run drip campaigns automatically, nice! Getting prospect calls coming in

Jenn N.

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Absolutely in love. I could create my own custom AI and shared it with my colleuges to get instant support from me, i mean digital AI of me :)

Derek W.

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

This is exactly what we have been looking for. Can't wait to run it

Simon

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Ideal for stock-watchlist and not missing trade setups that correspond to my strategy.

Builder

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

that's such a great AI

piw

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

The most humanly AI i have used so far but the problem is as soon as you start piling up messages in single chat session , it starts getting slow and at some point it starts freezing and also uses a lot of resources. For time being its okay to do 3 4 messages but as soon as we continue it has messages limitation and also starts getting very very slow . For the price of £18 per month this is unacceptable and with the newly introduced feature called project, if we start new chat within the project we cannot continue with the context we provided in other chats within same project. There are lot of improvements for them to work on. And to start with the its speed and its price

Bibash Katel

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Reducing manual efforts in first-pass during code-review process helps speed up the "final check" before merging PRs

Sahil Mohan Bansal

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

Very interesting

Béatrice Duval

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

This tool i found is super cool, I created 5 books from this tool to sell them online, which gives me great profit. I am creating more valuable books to spread knowledge, and earn some bucks as well 🤑.

Bilal Ashraf

5.02 weeks ago

“Review”

State of the Art

Dmitry G.

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I tried it and it seems capable to do a good seo research. The 5$ given were spend in a couple of ai chat prompts though.

Vadim Plăcintă

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

The best quality prompts of all the tools

Benjamin Tannenbaum

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

Helping brands get more traffic and conversion from AI search in the most effective way. Also including AI presence management features for individuals.

Arda Ulusoy

5.03 weeks ago