“Review”
It's sad to see people want to try your tool out but you have no free sample for them. This may be the best tool out there, but, as mentioned, going through with the AI for minutes to explain what you want, then being prompted to pay, without even knowing if it CAN create something, is discouraging. I hope we can get a free sample or preview at one point, im interested in this one.
Ron Jayson
“Review”
It's not free, it forces you to input an email before shoving a price tag in your face.
Arvoly XSL
“Review”
I'm still testing the tool yet it looks very promising. I tested it with a 5.5k words Academic text that I had previously red. I tested the Key points feature, it does work!
Ivana González
“Review”
Really amazing! Makes learning content and engaging with things so much easier!
Jamie McDonald
“Review”
The initial free version does not allow for starting a conversation that has already concluded. I asked the GPT if it would remember information about me or if I would be a "new person" for it in each session, and it said that each session is new. This is very discouraging because it is not possible to have a complete conversation.
cecilia cerri
“Review”
I’ve been using it for a month now and I have decided to keep it for a year. There definitely are some kinks they can still work out like file management, but it’s very good at it’s core function: it generally does a good job answering questions and most times identifies PDFs automatically and correctly. The browser plugin works great, and it’s very nice that @Papers allows you to add your university’s library API so you can automatically download PDFs that are accessible through your institution (sometimes it refuses to download some @Papers, so you just have to downlow it yourself and manually add it). The iPad and Android apps are serviceable. Every once in a while it will mess up the PDF identification, especially with @Papers from either very old sources or online-only journals. Things they must work on: * A much better system to annotate PDFs (the post-it type notes are cumbersome). * Introduce a notepad attached to each PDF or some way to easily link and save the AI’s output to the PDF. Currently, you have to add a little post it note and then paste the text there. * Keep the AI answers available after closing the documents. If you close the document by mistake or have several open and wish to close some, the ai conversation will be reset. * I REALLY wish that you could get citations and links to where the info was from extracted from PDFs. Currently, I have found Coral.ai does a much better job of showing you where the info came from and it even highlights it for you. Give it a try, their 30-day no credit card needed trial allowed me to truly test it, and now I’m a yearly subscriber looking forward for new additions and releases.
JB
“Review”
Thanks for the nice comment Cath! I'm working on it by myself, it's the first app that I build and I try to make the customer experience as good as I can. It's always the number one focus.
Marc Lamy
“Review”
The site has a fantastic presentation and from what we tested the features are perfect. Congratulations to the development team
Tudonumclic Consultoria
“Review”
Keep improving!
Abubakr Jajja
“Review”
It is not free. So i couldnt test anything
Isa Venancio
“Review”
The most humanly AI i have used so far but the problem is as soon as you start piling up messages in single chat session , it starts getting slow and at some point it starts freezing and also uses a lot of resources. For time being its okay to do 3 4 messages but as soon as we continue it has messages limitation and also starts getting very very slow . For the price of £18 per month this is unacceptable and with the newly introduced feature called project, if we start new chat within the project we cannot continue with the context we provided in other chats within same project. There are lot of improvements for them to work on. And to start with the its speed and its price
Bibash Katel
“Review”
Zero GPT which is supposed to be covered detects it with 100% certainty. So... No.
Stephan Tual
“Review”
This tool i found is super cool, I created 5 books from this tool to sell them online, which gives me great profit. I am creating more valuable books to spread knowledge, and earn some bucks as well 🤑.
Bilal Ashraf
“Review”
B12 exceeded my expectations especially after I tried a few similar tools. Signing up took under a minute and because I offer a very specific set of services as a consultant, I didn't expect the AI to be able to capture my work, but it did a great job with creating content for me. I only had to make a few edits, add my bio, and was able to publish that same day. Now I get lots of compliments on my site and I've even tried their other tools like email marketing, which is great because the emails match my site's appearance. Overall I would recommend B12 as an effective, affordable, and easy to use website solution.
Katie G
“Review”
I think it's the best @Image Generator I ever found on the net. It gives more accurate image according to the prompt. And thank you for keeping it for free.
My Sawsiri
“Review”
10 MB Limit does limit usability best if .pdf contains NO images.
Steve Bastiman
“Review”
Suppppeeeeerrr! Wowwww! @Mindsmith is absolutely fantastic! It is incredibly useful, easy to use, and very professional.
Claudia Scilletta
“Review”
I didn't get to the voices. I don't give my credit card information up front. I clicked away as soon as I saw that. It's a shame too, the pricing structure looked great.
David Marshall
“Review”
Great video!
Andrei
“Review”
superb, e gratis, merge blana, in EN se aude ideal
jon doe
“Review”
At last, we have a voice AI hub that works like OpenRouter.
Hank Darren
“Review”
Great AI voices, though still monotonous and robotic, or rather too neutral, with almost zero voice inflections! Excellent to read news, articles, essays, and any nonfiction books. BTW, computers should be allowed to TALK to us for free, like in the Star Trek TV series. Our future grandchildren will laugh at us for "paying" to use this everyday option, biting the hook to "monthly subscriptions" like gullible fish and then getting up to 1,000 words per month" under the so-called Pro version ;-) This is crazy!
Timeship
“Review”
too expensive for me, I just want to make memes, not pay that much
Grzegorz Rolnik