LIDA

Generate visualizations from data using AI

Free

LIDA Overview

What is LIDA?

LIDA is a powerful tool that automates data exploration and generates visualizations and infographics using large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT4. It provides a conversational interface for automatic generation of grammar-agnostic visualizations from data. LIDA consists of four modules: the Summarizer, which converts data into a compact natural language summary; the Goal Explorer, which enumerates visualization goals based on the data; the VisGenerator, which generates, refines, executes, and filters visualization code; and the Infographer, which produces data-faithful stylized graphics using image generation models.LIDA is compatible with any programming language or visualization grammar, allowing users to create visualizations in Python (e.g., Altair, Matplotlib, Seaborn), R, C++, and more. It also offers operations on existing visualizations, such as visualization explanation, self-evaluation, automatic repair, and recommendation.The tool supports various capabilities, including data summarization, automated data exploration, grammar-agnostic visualizations, and infographics generation. It leverages the language modeling and code-writing capabilities of LLMs, enabling core automated visualization capabilities. LIDA also provides operations on generated visualizations, such as visualization explanation, self-evaluation, visualization repair, and visualization recommendations.LIDA's architecture combines LLMs and image generation models (IGMs) to address the multi-stage generation problem of visualization creation. It is open-source and offers a Python API and a hybrid user interface for interactive chart, infographic, and data story generation.While LIDA has limitations with visualization grammars not well-represented in the LLM's training dataset and performance variations depending on the choice of visualization libraries and code generation capabilities, it remains a powerful tool for automating the visualization generation process. Help other people by letting them know if this AI was useful. Add your own prompts and outputs to help others understand how to use this AI.

Screenshot gallery

Pros & Cons

Pros

Automates data exploration
Generates infographics
Conversational interface
Grammar-agnostic visualizations
Comprises four modules
Compatible with any language
Supports various visualizations
Visualization explanation
Self-evaluation feature
Visualization repair
Auto visualization recommendations
LLMs and IGMs integration
Open-source
Python API provided
Interactive chart creation
Data story generation
Automated data summarization
Visualization in all grammars
Personalized infographic styles
Operations on generated visualizations
Automated improvement of visualizations
User-provided feedback feature
Hybrid user interface
Available via pip install
Auto generates visualization goals
Generates rich, natural language summaries
Safe code execution recommendation
Debugging/sensemaking applications
Supports multi-dimensional evaluation
Generates embellished infographics
Full automated mode available
Offers visualization evaluation scores
Access to visualization best practices
Compact data representation
Supports Altair, Matplotlib, Seaborn
Supports general code writing
Supports brand, style, marketing personalisation
Allows visualization comparison
Supports accessibility
Supports data literacy
Educational applications
Supports GPT3.5, GPT4 models

Cons

Limited visualization grammar support
Variable performance on libraries
Requires code execution
Sandbox environment recommended
Possibility of unsafe code
Performance relies on dataset type

A Professional Framework to Evaluate LIDA

When considering LIDA for integration into your organizational workflow, we recommend deploying a structured score card across three critical operational pillars: Security & Compliance, Integration Friction, and long-term Price Scalability. Rather than looking only at basic feature lists, modern procurement teams must assess how a software platform behaves under high load and how well it fits into the team's data security guidelines.

1. Security and Database Compliance

Depending on your operating region and field, ensure that LIDA supports standard security layers such as SOC 2 Type II certifications, GDPR compliance, or HIPAA-compliant database encryption. If the tool connects directly to client database tables or handles user passwords, verify that they implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), single sign-on (SSO) integrations, and end-to-end data encryption in transit and at rest.

2. API Coverage and Custom Integrations

Siloed data is the primary cause of operational friction. Evaluate if LIDA has native connectors for your current project trackers, messaging hubs, and customer communication channels. For custom developer requirements, check if they provide a fully documented REST API with reasonable rate limits, comprehensive Webhooks support, and robust SDK packages in your language. A flexible API layer saves hundreds of hours of manual copy-paste overhead.

3. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

SaaS pricing packages are often deceptively simple. When reviewing LIDA's billing structure, map out your team's projected expansion over the next 12 to 24 months. Determine how costs scale as your customer database increases or as you add team members. Factor in setup costs, mandatory support plan upgrades, API access fees, and storage overage rates to understand the true cost before committing to a contract.

By combining verified user reviews from our directory with internal workflow pilot tests, your procurement team can make an informed decision that drives productivity without creating capital waste.

Features of LIDA

Data Visualization
Data Exploration
AI Powered Analytics
Automatic Analytics
Data Discovery
Business Intelligence
Free

SaaS1to10 verified reviews for LIDA

Overall rating

5.0

Based on 23 reviews

5.01 days ago

“Review”

this is so good, i pasted a youtube link of 40 mins long video and it gave me a clean text nice to read and i didn’t find any mistakes. best part it only took 2 mins maybe less

beni1

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I tried NovelGPT a template in @Agentgpt and it did an excellent job writing the first two episodes of my novel complete with character descriptions, setting,plot points and well I think you get the point. Great tool can't wait to see it out of beta.

Kelli Crose

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

After my first use, I think it's surprisingly good. The only drawback so far is the PDF export option for the report which is formatless.

Alejandro Correa

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

O GPT faz uma análise melhor e mais personalizada.

Vinicius Vilela

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

As the service was in beta-testing stage, I created there a dozen of AI-generated courses for free. I wanted to use them. Those courses remained in my account as they started subscription tiers. But recently I have found out that they were deleted. The support didn't answer to my e-mail at all.

Oldfag TV

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

Was a good program, now offline unfortunately

test jantje

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

@Fabric is kind of like a combo of bookmarking/webclipper/summarizer/knowledgebase. Basically you can add information and it will auto organize it as well as let you chat with this information and search through it. It is not a “search engine tool” I wouldn’t say. Maybe you will be able to create a knowledge, base and information repository of everything relevant to you and be able to search through that information… But that is still different than a “search engine, tool” in my opinion. So far I think they are shooting for individuals and not enterprise users. Which is great because I have been wanting to find a product that will allow me to add information from PDFs, websites and videos and then be able to search/query/chat with that. But so many of the companies I have found that offer anything close to along these lines are developing knowledge bases with only company customers in mind. I get that that is where the money is, but @Fabric appears to be for actual people to use. The product is definitely underdevelopment, and I have the TestFlight of their iOS app. I wouldn’t say the app is perfect yet or anything, but they are actively developing it, and some of their ideas are changing and evolving not just minor changes to their user interface. I am using @Fabric and Mem at the same time and I will be interested to see which turns put to be more for me. Definitely check it out if you have not already done so they have the opportunity to make an extremely useful tool and kind of even changing the way individuals think about storing/accessing information important to them.

Extra Google Account

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I can't help but rave about this product because of the level of craftsmanship in it; @Vizly is made for data scientists, by data scientists, and it shows. Having tried various tools in the space, I can confidently say it's the best by a mile, the UX is silky smooth and will feel familiar to any data scientist, and yet it manages to supercharge your workflows - I gurantee you'll be a few times more productive, can't recommend it enough.

Amir Abushanab

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

Loved the search engine ideas.

Amr عمرو Amin امين

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

Great product to offload the data analytics workflow.

Pedro A Porras Luraschi

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

Makes it easy to get started with a presentation if you have an outline, but as soon as you want more control, you're better off using Google Slides. @Gamma's feature that I used the most was image generation - you can select among a variety of models (Ideogram, Flux, DALL-E, but not Midjourney), and it shows 3 variations to choose from. Performance is slow and a little janky, even in Chrome. Prompts and settings are often not respected - e.g. you set it to "preserve text" and just generate slides, and it goes onto dumping an entire 3 paragraphs of text in one slide. You can't overlay text over images (e.g. for image attribution), and there's no precise positioning control, or grouping elements. No way to control table layout, e.g. to have two images slide-by-side in full bleed mode. I tried @Gamma for a new presentation, but next time I need to make a presentation, I'll go back to Google Slides and generate images independently.

Dan Dascalescu

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

It is the ease of use for me. @DataSquirrel is fast, the UI is super intuitive, and the guided analysis feature is highly convenient. I have officially moved from uploading CSV files from Google sheet to @DataSquirrel. Within minutes, I can visualize my data and interpreting it becomes super simple.

Aakriti Mahajan

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I already have another transcription tool, but this one is much better. I love the different features such as the summary, quiz, and chapters. It does a great job of them. I've only done one transcript so far to try it out, but I'm truly impressed and am going to grab another code. A couple things that would make it even better are: - the ability to rename the files and organize them through folders. - the ability to download a copy of the other features as well as the transcript. Copying and pasting it works, but doesn't keep the format.

dunn

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I think it's the best @Image Generator I ever found on the net. It gives more accurate image according to the prompt. And thank you for keeping it for free.

My Sawsiri

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

We will give you guys a go! thanks!

Silent Co

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

Beatiful, easy and AI insights very useful.

Mauricio Gleizer

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I'm still testing the tool yet it looks very promising. I tested it with a 5.5k words Academic text that I had previously red. I tested the Key points feature, it does work!

Ivana González

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

good nothing more to say just very good

yves Anguilet

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I was just trying to get a quick graph showing population evolution over the last 30 years, didn’t have the dataset ready, so I was hoping the tool could auto-fill something reasonable. But it literally gave me three values. Three?? For 30 years?? What kind of trend can I possibly see with that? If the tool offers to research the data, it should at least offer a full timeline. And when I pasted the data I found, it created a literally bar chart???

Curtis Walls

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

it is an excellent innovation

UNNAM SAI CHARAN

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

I felt there is need of more ready made templates. But, it does what it claims. I chose one question suggested by the AI agent, and it created the infographics in few seconds. It's cool. Saving it for future reference.

Harrison Oliver

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

quick to pick up, slick results. turned my prompts into clean logo drafts n poster layouts fast; pixel-art style worked after a couple tweaks. wish it had true vector export and tighter font control, but for fast art ideas it’s great. 5/5

Oleg John

5.03 weeks ago

“Review”

It's absolutely stunning how accurate it transforms your prompts into images, thanks to Dall-e 3. You have 15 boosts, after that image creation takes longer. You can create 30 images per day. You can organize your creations in gallery folders. However, the restrictions are insane, they filter out too many words / combinations of words. If you use words that are filtered, it will block your prompt, but won't tell you which word of your prompt it was. After several tries that resulted in a blocked prompt, you will be banned. This can mean for an hour, a day,... or permanently. If your prompt is OK, the AI will start to generate the images but if the created images are considered 'unsafe content', as the AI created something that could be considered offensive, it won't show you the resulting images. This is really annoying, you can't even create an image with several people in swimwear on a beach, it will generate only one person in swimwear, the other ones are wearing street wear for modesty or decency, I guess. But a single person in swimwear at a beach is ok. The logic behind that doesn't make sense. This could be way better if it would at least tell you the blocked words or mark them. And if you could decide for yourself if you want to see the created 'unsafe' images anyway.

Marshmallowfroggy